Comparison · Last updated 2026-07-01

Notat vs Freed

Notat vs Freed AI: an honest, dated comparison of AI architecture and hallucination safeguards, languages, compliance, deployment, and pricing for clinical AI documentation.

Guide d'achat pratique

Là où Notat est plus performant

FactsContext™ extracts clinical facts first, writes from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician for review.

Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages and product translation in 15 languages, with multilingual and cross-language workflows treated as core use cases.

Notat is Epic-capable without being Epic-locked, so small practices and non-Epic clinics can start without adopting an Epic-first stack.

Là où Freed peut être plus performant

Solo clinicians who prefer Freed’s exact note style or pricing after trialing it.

Teams whose requirements are limited to basic note drafting and do not require broader platform workflows.

Compatibilité Epic et EHR

Freed is strongest when an individual clinician wants a simple scribe and has verified Freed’s current workflow against their own requirements. Notat fits teams that want EHR flexibility: Epic can be supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records, but Notat is not dependent on Epic and is lighter than Epic-first enterprise scribes.

Compatibilité linguistique et conformité

Notat is strongest when multilingual capture, EU/GDPR posture, HIPAA with BAA, zero audio retention, and clinician-visible facts are buying criteria. Competitor language and compliance claims should be checked against current public documentation and your data-processing requirements.

Recommandation

Choose Freed if its simple individual-clinician workflow is enough. Choose Notat when you want facts-first review, raw medical facts, coding evidence, multilingual support, and a platform that extends beyond the note.

Notat

Notat is the Clinical AI Platform built on the patent-pending FactsContext™ engine: it extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter first, generates documentation from those facts — never straight from a transcript — and shows the raw facts to the clinician. Multilingual by design, Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages through its AssemblyAI-powered speech layer, and the product is translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi. GDPR-native with EU hosting, HIPAA-compliant with BAA, Epic-capable through the same EHR integration layer as other records, and built for independent and allied-health practices as well as clinics.

Freed

Freed is an AI scribe popular with individual clinicians. We have not yet completed sourced research on Freed's architecture, languages, compliance, and deployment options; unverified cells below are marked "Not publicly documented".

Comparaison des fonctionnalités

Les cellules du concurrent indiquent la date de leur dernière vérification à partir de sources publiques. Tout ce que nous n'avons pas pu vérifier est marqué « Non documenté publiquement » — jamais deviné.

AI architecture & hallucination safeguards

Facts-first generation (hallucination safeguard)

Notat

Oui

FactsContext™ (patent pending): documentation is generated from extracted clinical facts, not raw transcripts

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

Raw clinical facts shown to the clinician

Notat

Oui

Raw extracted medical facts are shown to the clinician to inspect, verify, and reuse

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

Features

Ambient visit documentation

Notat

Oui

Ambient capture during the visit — no dictation required

Freed

Oui

AI scribe

au 2026-07-01

Medical coding suggestions

Notat

Oui

ICD-10 and 9 other coding systems, with supporting evidence excerpts

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

Native iPhone, iPad & Mac apps

Notat

Oui

Native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps plus web

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

Languages

Multilingual & cross-language documentation

Notat

Oui

Spoken capture in 99+ languages; product translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

Compliance & data handling

GDPR-native / EU hosting

Notat

Oui

GDPR-native, EU/Norway hosting

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

HIPAA / BAA

Notat

Oui

HIPAA-compliant; BAA available

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

Zero audio retention

Notat

Oui

Zero audio retention — processed and deleted

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

Deployment

Epic / EHR support

Notat

Partielle

Epic is supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records; Notat is not Epic-only or dependent on Epic

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

Pricing & getting started

Self-serve free trial

Notat

Oui

14 days free, no credit card, self-serve start

Freed

Non documenté publiquement

Qui devrait choisir quoi ?

Choisissez Notat si…

You want the note generated from verifiable extracted facts, not a transcript

You want coding, referrals, and patient instructions from one clinical understanding

Choisissez Freed si…

Evaluate Freed directly against your requirements — see their documentation for current capabilities

Foire aux questions

How does Notat's approach to hallucinations differ from Freed?

Notat's patent-pending FactsContext™ engine extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter before generating any documentation, and only writes from those facts — the raw facts are shown to you so every sentence can be verified against its source. Most AI scribes generate notes directly from a transcript, which leaves more room for unsupported statements. Check Freed's public documentation for details of their safeguards.

Do clinicians still review notes in Notat?

Always. You review and sign every note — Notat makes review faster because you can check the note against the extracted clinical facts instead of re-listening to the visit.

Is this comparison with Freed objective?

We aim to be factual and fair. Every competitor claim carries a visible "as of" date and, where available, a public source. Cells we cannot verify from public documentation are marked "Not publicly documented" rather than guessed. If something is out of date, contact us and we will correct it.

Découvrez les faits derrière votre prochaine note.

Le moyen le plus rapide de comparer est de l'essayer : enregistrez une consultation, regardez FactsContext™ extraire les faits cliniques, et lisez une note que vous pouvez vérifier ligne par ligne.

Essayer Notat gratuitement