Notat vs Nabla
Notat vs Nabla: an honest, dated comparison of AI architecture and hallucination safeguards, languages, compliance, deployment, and pricing for clinical AI documentation.
Guía práctica de compra
Donde Notat es más fuerte
FactsContext™ extracts clinical facts first, writes from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician for review.
Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages and product translation in 15 languages, with multilingual and cross-language workflows treated as core use cases.
Notat is Epic-capable without being Epic-locked, so small practices and non-Epic clinics can start without adopting an Epic-first stack.
Donde Nabla puede ser más fuerte
Clinicians who prioritize a lightweight standalone scribe experience.
Organizations already evaluating or using Nabla Connect.
Teams where copy-paste into the record is acceptable operationally.
Ajuste con Epic y EHR
Nabla is strongest when the buyer wants a polished standalone ambient scribe and is comfortable with copy-paste or Nabla Connect availability. Notat fits teams that want EHR flexibility: Epic can be supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records, but Notat is not dependent on Epic and is lighter than Epic-first enterprise scribes.
Ajuste de idioma y cumplimiento
Notat is strongest when multilingual capture, EU/GDPR posture, HIPAA with BAA, zero audio retention, and clinician-visible facts are buying criteria. Competitor language and compliance claims should be checked against current public documentation and your data-processing requirements.
Recomendación
Choose Nabla when standalone ambient documentation is the main need. Choose Notat when you want the raw clinical facts visible, coding and referrals generated from the same fact layer, 99+ spoken-language capture, and EHR flexibility including partial Epic support.
Notat
Notat is the Clinical AI Platform built on the patent-pending FactsContext™ engine: it extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter first, generates documentation from those facts — never straight from a transcript — and shows the raw facts to the clinician. Multilingual by design, Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages through its AssemblyAI-powered speech layer, and the product is translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi. GDPR-native with EU hosting, HIPAA-compliant with BAA, Epic-capable through the same EHR integration layer as other records, and built for independent and allied-health practices as well as clinics.
Nabla
Nabla is an ambient scribe known for strong UX, growing quickly, with "Nabla Connect" for EHR embedding. Its primary workflow has historically been standalone with copy-paste into the record.
Comparación de características
Las celdas del competidor llevan la fecha en que fueron verificadas por última vez a partir de fuentes públicas. Cualquier cosa que no hayamos podido verificar se marca como "No documentado públicamente" — nunca es una suposición.
AI architecture & hallucination safeguards
Facts-first generation (hallucination safeguard)
Notat
Sí
FactsContext™ (patent pending): documentation is generated from extracted clinical facts, not raw transcripts
Nabla
No documentado públicamente
Raw clinical facts shown to the clinician
Notat
Sí
Raw extracted medical facts are shown to the clinician to inspect, verify, and reuse
Nabla
No documentado públicamente
Features
Ambient visit documentation
Notat
Sí
Ambient capture during the visit — no dictation required
Nabla
Sí
Ambient scribe with strong UX
a partir del 2026-06-15
Medical coding suggestions
Notat
Sí
ICD-10 and 9 other coding systems, with supporting evidence excerpts
Nabla
No documentado públicamente
Native iPhone, iPad & Mac apps
Notat
Sí
Native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps plus web
Nabla
No documentado públicamente
Languages
Multilingual & cross-language documentation
Notat
Sí
Spoken capture in 99+ languages; product translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi
Nabla
No documentado públicamente
Compliance & data handling
GDPR-native / EU hosting
Notat
Sí
GDPR-native, EU/Norway hosting
Nabla
No documentado públicamente
HIPAA / BAA
Notat
Sí
HIPAA-compliant; BAA available
Nabla
No documentado públicamente
Zero audio retention
Notat
Sí
Zero audio retention — processed and deleted
Nabla
No documentado públicamente
Deployment
Epic / EHR support
Notat
Parcial
Epic is supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records; Notat is not Epic-only or dependent on Epic
Nabla
Parcial
Primarily standalone; "Nabla Connect" for EHR embedding
a partir del 2026-06-15
Pricing & getting started
Self-serve free trial
Notat
Sí
14 days free, no credit card, self-serve start
Nabla
No documentado públicamente
¿Quién debería elegir cada uno?
Elija Notat si…
You want the note generated from verifiable extracted facts, not a transcript
You want coding, referrals, and patient instructions from the same clinical understanding
You need GDPR-native EU hosting and multilingual encounters
Elija Nabla si…
You want a lightweight standalone scribe and are happy with copy-paste
Your organization has already adopted Nabla Connect
Fuentes
• Nabla's primary workflow has been standalone with EHR embedding via Nabla Connect. (a partir del 2026-06-15)
Preguntas frecuentes
How does Notat's approach to hallucinations differ from Nabla?
Notat's patent-pending FactsContext™ engine extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter before generating any documentation, and only writes from those facts — the raw facts are shown to you so every sentence can be verified against its source. Most AI scribes generate notes directly from a transcript, which leaves more room for unsupported statements. Check Nabla's public documentation for details of their safeguards.
Do clinicians still review notes in Notat?
Always. You review and sign every note — Notat makes review faster because you can check the note against the extracted clinical facts instead of re-listening to the visit.
Is this comparison with Nabla objective?
We aim to be factual and fair. Every competitor claim carries a visible "as of" date and, where available, a public source. Cells we cannot verify from public documentation are marked "Not publicly documented" rather than guessed. If something is out of date, contact us and we will correct it.
Siga evaluando
FactsContext™
Vea por qué Notat extrae hechos primero en lugar de escribir directamente de las transcripciones.
Abierto
Método de evaluación
Revise la metodología transparente de alucinaciones y los ejemplos.
Abierto
Escriba multilingüe
Más de 99 idiomas hablados y 15 idiomas de producto traducidos.
Abierto
hub de ICD-10
Vea sugerencias de código con evidencia y guías específicas según la condición.
Abierto
Vea los hechos detrás de su próxima nota.
La forma más rápida de comparar es probarlo: grabe una consulta, observe cómo FactsContext™ extrae los hechos clínicos y lea una nota que puede verificar línea por línea.
Pruebe Notat gratis