Comparison · Last updated 2026-07-01

Notat vs Sully AI

Notat vs Sully AI: an honest, dated comparison of AI architecture and hallucination safeguards, languages, compliance, deployment, and pricing for clinical AI documentation.

Guía práctica de compra

Donde Notat es más fuerte

FactsContext™ extracts clinical facts first, writes from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician for review.

Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages and product translation in 15 languages, with multilingual and cross-language workflows treated as core use cases.

Notat is Epic-capable without being Epic-locked, so small practices and non-Epic clinics can start without adopting an Epic-first stack.

Donde Sully AI puede ser más fuerte

Teams that evaluate Sully directly and prefer its assistant experience.

Organizations that want a broader AI assistant workflow rather than a facts-first documentation platform.

Ajuste con Epic y EHR

Sully AI is strongest when Sully’s current healthcare assistant capabilities match the buyer’s desired assistant workflow. Notat fits teams that want EHR flexibility: Epic can be supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records, but Notat is not dependent on Epic and is lighter than Epic-first enterprise scribes.

Ajuste de idioma y cumplimiento

Notat is strongest when multilingual capture, EU/GDPR posture, HIPAA with BAA, zero audio retention, and clinician-visible facts are buying criteria. Competitor language and compliance claims should be checked against current public documentation and your data-processing requirements.

Recomendación

Choose Sully if its assistant workflow is the primary need. Choose Notat when the priority is facts-first clinical documentation, raw fact visibility, evidence-backed coding, multilingual support, and EHR flexibility.

Notat

Notat is the Clinical AI Platform built on the patent-pending FactsContext™ engine: it extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter first, generates documentation from those facts — never straight from a transcript — and shows the raw facts to the clinician. Multilingual by design, Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages through its AssemblyAI-powered speech layer, and the product is translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi. GDPR-native with EU hosting, HIPAA-compliant with BAA, Epic-capable through the same EHR integration layer as other records, and built for independent and allied-health practices as well as clinics.

Sully AI

Sully AI offers AI assistants for healthcare. We have not yet completed sourced research on Sully's architecture, languages, compliance, and deployment options; unverified cells below are marked "Not publicly documented".

Comparación de características

Las celdas del competidor llevan la fecha en que fueron verificadas por última vez a partir de fuentes públicas. Cualquier cosa que no hayamos podido verificar se marca como "No documentado públicamente" — nunca es una suposición.

AI architecture & hallucination safeguards

Facts-first generation (hallucination safeguard)

Notat

FactsContext™ (patent pending): documentation is generated from extracted clinical facts, not raw transcripts

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

Raw clinical facts shown to the clinician

Notat

Raw extracted medical facts are shown to the clinician to inspect, verify, and reuse

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

Features

Ambient visit documentation

Notat

Ambient capture during the visit — no dictation required

Sully AI

AI assistant for healthcare

a partir del 2026-07-01

Medical coding suggestions

Notat

ICD-10 and 9 other coding systems, with supporting evidence excerpts

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

Native iPhone, iPad & Mac apps

Notat

Native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps plus web

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

Languages

Multilingual & cross-language documentation

Notat

Spoken capture in 99+ languages; product translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

Compliance & data handling

GDPR-native / EU hosting

Notat

GDPR-native, EU/Norway hosting

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

HIPAA / BAA

Notat

HIPAA-compliant; BAA available

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

Zero audio retention

Notat

Zero audio retention — processed and deleted

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

Deployment

Epic / EHR support

Notat

Parcial

Epic is supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records; Notat is not Epic-only or dependent on Epic

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

Pricing & getting started

Self-serve free trial

Notat

14 days free, no credit card, self-serve start

Sully AI

No documentado públicamente

¿Quién debería elegir cada uno?

Elija Notat si…

You want the note generated from verifiable extracted facts, not a transcript

You need multilingual documentation, EU hosting, or HIPAA with BAA

Elija Sully AI si…

Evaluate Sully AI directly against your requirements — see their documentation for current capabilities

Preguntas frecuentes

How does Notat's approach to hallucinations differ from Sully AI?

Notat's patent-pending FactsContext™ engine extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter before generating any documentation, and only writes from those facts — the raw facts are shown to you so every sentence can be verified against its source. Most AI scribes generate notes directly from a transcript, which leaves more room for unsupported statements. Check Sully AI's public documentation for details of their safeguards.

Do clinicians still review notes in Notat?

Always. You review and sign every note — Notat makes review faster because you can check the note against the extracted clinical facts instead of re-listening to the visit.

Is this comparison with Sully AI objective?

We aim to be factual and fair. Every competitor claim carries a visible "as of" date and, where available, a public source. Cells we cannot verify from public documentation are marked "Not publicly documented" rather than guessed. If something is out of date, contact us and we will correct it.

Vea los hechos detrás de su próxima nota.

La forma más rápida de comparar es probarlo: grabe una consulta, observe cómo FactsContext™ extrae los hechos clínicos y lea una nota que puede verificar línea por línea.

Pruebe Notat gratis