Comparison · Last updated 2026-07-01

Notat vs Sully AI

Notat vs Sully AI: an honest, dated comparison of AI architecture and hallucination safeguards, languages, compliance, deployment, and pricing for clinical AI documentation.

Praktische aankoopbegeleiding

Waar Notat sterker is

FactsContext™ extracts clinical facts first, writes from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician for review.

Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages and product translation in 15 languages, with multilingual and cross-language workflows treated as core use cases.

Notat is Epic-capable without being Epic-locked, so small practices and non-Epic clinics can start without adopting an Epic-first stack.

Waar Sully AI sterker kan zijn

Teams that evaluate Sully directly and prefer its assistant experience.

Organizations that want a broader AI assistant workflow rather than a facts-first documentation platform.

Epic en EHR-match

Sully AI is strongest when Sully’s current healthcare assistant capabilities match the buyer’s desired assistant workflow. Notat fits teams that want EHR flexibility: Epic can be supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records, but Notat is not dependent on Epic and is lighter than Epic-first enterprise scribes.

Taal- en compliance-match

Notat is strongest when multilingual capture, EU/GDPR posture, HIPAA with BAA, zero audio retention, and clinician-visible facts are buying criteria. Competitor language and compliance claims should be checked against current public documentation and your data-processing requirements.

Aanbeveling

Choose Sully if its assistant workflow is the primary need. Choose Notat when the priority is facts-first clinical documentation, raw fact visibility, evidence-backed coding, multilingual support, and EHR flexibility.

Notat

Notat is the Clinical AI Platform built on the patent-pending FactsContext™ engine: it extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter first, generates documentation from those facts — never straight from a transcript — and shows the raw facts to the clinician. Multilingual by design, Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages through its AssemblyAI-powered speech layer, and the product is translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi. GDPR-native with EU hosting, HIPAA-compliant with BAA, Epic-capable through the same EHR integration layer as other records, and built for independent and allied-health practices as well as clinics.

Sully AI

Sully AI offers AI assistants for healthcare. We have not yet completed sourced research on Sully's architecture, languages, compliance, and deployment options; unverified cells below are marked "Not publicly documented".

Vergelijking van functies

Concurrentcellen tonen de datum waarop ze voor het laatst zijn geverifieerd via publieke bronnen. Alles wat we niet konden verifiëren is gemarkeerd als "Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd" — nooit gegokt.

AI architecture & hallucination safeguards

Facts-first generation (hallucination safeguard)

Notat

Ja

FactsContext™ (patent pending): documentation is generated from extracted clinical facts, not raw transcripts

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

Raw clinical facts shown to the clinician

Notat

Ja

Raw extracted medical facts are shown to the clinician to inspect, verify, and reuse

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

Features

Ambient visit documentation

Notat

Ja

Ambient capture during the visit — no dictation required

Sully AI

Ja

AI assistant for healthcare

per 2026-07-01

Medical coding suggestions

Notat

Ja

ICD-10 and 9 other coding systems, with supporting evidence excerpts

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

Native iPhone, iPad & Mac apps

Notat

Ja

Native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps plus web

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

Languages

Multilingual & cross-language documentation

Notat

Ja

Spoken capture in 99+ languages; product translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

Compliance & data handling

GDPR-native / EU hosting

Notat

Ja

GDPR-native, EU/Norway hosting

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

HIPAA / BAA

Notat

Ja

HIPAA-compliant; BAA available

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

Zero audio retention

Notat

Ja

Zero audio retention — processed and deleted

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

Deployment

Epic / EHR support

Notat

Gedeeltelijk

Epic is supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records; Notat is not Epic-only or dependent on Epic

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

Pricing & getting started

Self-serve free trial

Notat

Ja

14 days free, no credit card, self-serve start

Sully AI

Niet publiekelijk gedocumenteerd

Wie moet welke kiezen?

Kies Notat als…

You want the note generated from verifiable extracted facts, not a transcript

You need multilingual documentation, EU hosting, or HIPAA with BAA

Kies Sully AI als…

Evaluate Sully AI directly against your requirements — see their documentation for current capabilities

Veelgestelde vragen

How does Notat's approach to hallucinations differ from Sully AI?

Notat's patent-pending FactsContext™ engine extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter before generating any documentation, and only writes from those facts — the raw facts are shown to you so every sentence can be verified against its source. Most AI scribes generate notes directly from a transcript, which leaves more room for unsupported statements. Check Sully AI's public documentation for details of their safeguards.

Do clinicians still review notes in Notat?

Always. You review and sign every note — Notat makes review faster because you can check the note against the extracted clinical facts instead of re-listening to the visit.

Is this comparison with Sully AI objective?

We aim to be factual and fair. Every competitor claim carries a visible "as of" date and, where available, a public source. Cells we cannot verify from public documentation are marked "Not publicly documented" rather than guessed. If something is out of date, contact us and we will correct it.

Zie de feiten achter uw volgende verslag.

De snelste manier om te vergelijken is door het uit te proberen: neem een consult op, kijk hoe FactsContext™ klinische feiten extraheert, en lees een notitie die u regel voor regel kunt verifiëren.

Probeer Notat gratis