Comparison · Last updated 2026-06-15

Notat vs Suki

Notat vs Suki: an honest, dated comparison of AI architecture and hallucination safeguards, languages, compliance, deployment, and pricing for clinical AI documentation.

Guida pratica all'acquisto

Dove Notat è più forte

FactsContext™ extracts clinical facts first, writes from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician for review.

Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages and product translation in 15 languages, with multilingual and cross-language workflows treated as core use cases.

Notat is Epic-capable without being Epic-locked, so small practices and non-Epic clinics can start without adopting an Epic-first stack.

Dove Suki potrebbe essere più forte

US practices already using an EHR where Suki has deep embedding.

Teams that want broader voice-assistant commands in addition to note drafting.

Buyers who prefer an integration-led rollout over self-serve start.

Integrazione con Epic ed EHR

Suki is strongest when the practice is US-based and wants a voice assistant embedded into a supported EHR workflow. Notat fits teams that want EHR flexibility: Epic can be supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records, but Notat is not dependent on Epic and is lighter than Epic-first enterprise scribes.

Affinità tra lingua e conformità

Notat is strongest when multilingual capture, EU/GDPR posture, HIPAA with BAA, zero audio retention, and clinician-visible facts are buying criteria. Competitor language and compliance claims should be checked against current public documentation and your data-processing requirements.

Raccomandazione

Choose Suki when its EHR assistant workflow matches your US practice. Choose Notat when you need facts-first note generation, visible raw context, multilingual workflows, and a self-serve path that does not depend on a specific EHR integration.

Notat

Notat is the Clinical AI Platform built on the patent-pending FactsContext™ engine: it extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter first, generates documentation from those facts — never straight from a transcript — and shows the raw facts to the clinician. Multilingual by design, Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages through its AssemblyAI-powered speech layer, and the product is translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi. GDPR-native with EU hosting, HIPAA-compliant with BAA, Epic-capable through the same EHR integration layer as other records, and built for independent and allied-health practices as well as clinics.

Suki

Suki is a US-focused voice AI assistant and scribe, well funded ($70M Series D in October 2024) and known for deep EHR embedding with partners such as MEDENT.

Confronto delle funzionalità

Le celle del competitor riportano la data dell'ultima verifica effettuata tramite fonti pubbliche. Tutto ciò che non abbiamo potuto verificare è contrassegnato come "Non documentato pubblicamente" — mai ipotizzato.

AI architecture & hallucination safeguards

Facts-first generation (hallucination safeguard)

Notat

FactsContext™ (patent pending): documentation is generated from extracted clinical facts, not raw transcripts

Suki

Non documentato pubblicamente

Raw clinical facts shown to the clinician

Notat

Raw extracted medical facts are shown to the clinician to inspect, verify, and reuse

Suki

Non documentato pubblicamente

Features

Ambient visit documentation

Notat

Ambient capture during the visit — no dictation required

Suki

Voice AI assistant + ambient scribe

al 2026-06-15

Medical coding suggestions

Notat

ICD-10 and 9 other coding systems, with supporting evidence excerpts

Suki

Non documentato pubblicamente

Native iPhone, iPad & Mac apps

Notat

Native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps plus web

Suki

Non documentato pubblicamente

Languages

Multilingual & cross-language documentation

Notat

Spoken capture in 99+ languages; product translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi

Suki

Non documentato pubblicamente

Compliance & data handling

GDPR-native / EU hosting

Notat

GDPR-native, EU/Norway hosting

Suki

Non documentato pubblicamente

HIPAA / BAA

Notat

HIPAA-compliant; BAA available

Suki

Non documentato pubblicamente

Zero audio retention

Notat

Zero audio retention — processed and deleted

Suki

Non documentato pubblicamente

Deployment

Epic / EHR support

Notat

Parziale

Epic is supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records; Notat is not Epic-only or dependent on Epic

Suki

Parziale

US-focused, integration-dependent EHR embedding

al 2026-06-15

Pricing & getting started

Self-serve free trial

Notat

14 days free, no credit card, self-serve start

Suki

Non documentato pubblicamente

Chi dovrebbe scegliere quale?

Scegli Notat se…

You want facts-first documentation with visible clinical facts

You practice outside the US or need multilingual notes

You want to start without an EHR integration project

Scegli Suki se…

Your US practice runs an EHR that Suki embeds into deeply

Voice-assistant commands (not just documentation) are a priority

Fonti

Suki raised a $70M Series D in October 2024. (al 2026-06-15)fonte

Domande frequenti

How does Notat's approach to hallucinations differ from Suki?

Notat's patent-pending FactsContext™ engine extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter before generating any documentation, and only writes from those facts — the raw facts are shown to you so every sentence can be verified against its source. Most AI scribes generate notes directly from a transcript, which leaves more room for unsupported statements. Check Suki's public documentation for details of their safeguards.

Do clinicians still review notes in Notat?

Always. You review and sign every note — Notat makes review faster because you can check the note against the extracted clinical facts instead of re-listening to the visit.

Is this comparison with Suki objective?

We aim to be factual and fair. Every competitor claim carries a visible "as of" date and, where available, a public source. Cells we cannot verify from public documentation are marked "Not publicly documented" rather than guessed. If something is out of date, contact us and we will correct it.

Scopri i fatti dietro la tua prossima nota.

Il modo più veloce per confrontarli è provarli: registra una consulenza, guarda FactsContext™ estrarre i fatti clinici e leggi un appunto che puoi verificare riga per riga.

Prova Notat gratuitamente