Notat vs Suki
Notat vs Suki: an honest, dated comparison of AI architecture and hallucination safeguards, languages, compliance, deployment, and pricing for clinical AI documentation.
Praktiline ostujuht
Kus Notat on tugevam
FactsContext™ extracts clinical facts first, writes from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician for review.
Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages and product translation in 15 languages, with multilingual and cross-language workflows treated as core use cases.
Notat is Epic-capable without being Epic-locked, so small practices and non-Epic clinics can start without adopting an Epic-first stack.
Kus Suki võib olla tugevam
US practices already using an EHR where Suki has deep embedding.
Teams that want broader voice-assistant commands in addition to note drafting.
Buyers who prefer an integration-led rollout over self-serve start.
Epic ja EHR sobivus
Suki is strongest when the practice is US-based and wants a voice assistant embedded into a supported EHR workflow. Notat fits teams that want EHR flexibility: Epic can be supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records, but Notat is not dependent on Epic and is lighter than Epic-first enterprise scribes.
Keel ja vastavus loovadid
Notat is strongest when multilingual capture, EU/GDPR posture, HIPAA with BAA, zero audio retention, and clinician-visible facts are buying criteria. Competitor language and compliance claims should be checked against current public documentation and your data-processing requirements.
Soovitus
Choose Suki when its EHR assistant workflow matches your US practice. Choose Notat when you need facts-first note generation, visible raw context, multilingual workflows, and a self-serve path that does not depend on a specific EHR integration.
Notat
Notat is the Clinical AI Platform built on the patent-pending FactsContext™ engine: it extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter first, generates documentation from those facts — never straight from a transcript — and shows the raw facts to the clinician. Multilingual by design, Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages through its AssemblyAI-powered speech layer, and the product is translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi. GDPR-native with EU hosting, HIPAA-compliant with BAA, Epic-capable through the same EHR integration layer as other records, and built for independent and allied-health practices as well as clinics.
Suki
Suki is a US-focused voice AI assistant and scribe, well funded ($70M Series D in October 2024) and known for deep EHR embedding with partners such as MEDENT.
Funktsionaalsuste võrdlus
Konkurendi lahtrid kannavad kuupäeva, mil need avalikest allikatest viimati kinnitati. Kõik, mida ei suudetud kinnitada, on märgitud kui "Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud" — kunagi ei arvata.
AI architecture & hallucination safeguards
Facts-first generation (hallucination safeguard)
Notat
Jah
FactsContext™ (patent pending): documentation is generated from extracted clinical facts, not raw transcripts
Suki
Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud
Raw clinical facts shown to the clinician
Notat
Jah
Raw extracted medical facts are shown to the clinician to inspect, verify, and reuse
Suki
Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud
Features
Ambient visit documentation
Notat
Jah
Ambient capture during the visit — no dictation required
Suki
Jah
Voice AI assistant + ambient scribe
kuupäevala 2026-06-15
Medical coding suggestions
Notat
Jah
ICD-10 and 9 other coding systems, with supporting evidence excerpts
Suki
Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud
Native iPhone, iPad & Mac apps
Notat
Jah
Native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps plus web
Suki
Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud
Languages
Multilingual & cross-language documentation
Notat
Jah
Spoken capture in 99+ languages; product translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi
Suki
Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud
Compliance & data handling
GDPR-native / EU hosting
Notat
Jah
GDPR-native, EU/Norway hosting
Suki
Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud
HIPAA / BAA
Notat
Jah
HIPAA-compliant; BAA available
Suki
Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud
Zero audio retention
Notat
Jah
Zero audio retention — processed and deleted
Suki
Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud
Deployment
Epic / EHR support
Notat
Poolik
Epic is supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records; Notat is not Epic-only or dependent on Epic
Suki
Poolik
US-focused, integration-dependent EHR embedding
kuupäevala 2026-06-15
Pricing & getting started
Self-serve free trial
Notat
Jah
14 days free, no credit card, self-serve start
Suki
Ei ole avalikult dokumenteeritud
Kes peaks valima kumbri?
Valige Notat, kui…
You want facts-first documentation with visible clinical facts
You practice outside the US or need multilingual notes
You want to start without an EHR integration project
Vali Suki, kui…
Your US practice runs an EHR that Suki embeds into deeply
Voice-assistant commands (not just documentation) are a priority
Allikad
• Suki raised a $70M Series D in October 2024. (kuupäevala 2026-06-15) — allikas
Sagedalt esitatud küsimused
How does Notat's approach to hallucinations differ from Suki?
Notat's patent-pending FactsContext™ engine extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter before generating any documentation, and only writes from those facts — the raw facts are shown to you so every sentence can be verified against its source. Most AI scribes generate notes directly from a transcript, which leaves more room for unsupported statements. Check Suki's public documentation for details of their safeguards.
Do clinicians still review notes in Notat?
Always. You review and sign every note — Notat makes review faster because you can check the note against the extracted clinical facts instead of re-listening to the visit.
Is this comparison with Suki objective?
We aim to be factual and fair. Every competitor claim carries a visible "as of" date and, where available, a public source. Cells we cannot verify from public documentation are marked "Not publicly documented" rather than guessed. If something is out of date, contact us and we will correct it.
Jätka analüüsi
FactsContext™
Vaata, miks Notat ekstraktib esmalt faktid, rather kui kirjutada otse transkriptidest.
Avatud
Hinnangu meetod
Vaata läbipaistvat hallukatsioonimetoodoloogiat ja näiteid.
Avatud
Multikeelne kirjutaja
99+ kõneelt ja 15 tõlgitud tootekeelt.
Avatud
ICD-10 keskus
Vaata koodiettepanekuid koos tõendite ja haigusespeciaalsete juhenditega.
Avatud
Vaata fakte oma järgmise märkuse taga.
Kihtima võrdlustavaks viis on proovida: jääldage konsultatsioonile, vaadake kuidas FactsContext™ ekstrakteerib kliinilised faktid ning lugege märkmust, mida saate rida-rida kontrollida.
Proovi Notat tasuta