Notat vs Suki
Notat vs Suki: an honest, dated comparison of AI architecture and hallucination safeguards, languages, compliance, deployment, and pricing for clinical AI documentation.
seisuga 2026-06-15
Praktilised ostujuhendised
Kus Notat on tugevam
FactsContext™ extracts clinical facts first, writes from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician for review.
Notat supports spoken capture in 90+ languages, with multilingual and cross-language workflows treated as core use cases.
Notat is Epic-capable without being Epic-locked, so small practices and non-Epic clinics can start without adopting an Epic-first stack.
Kus Suki võib olla tugevam
US practices already using an EHR where Suki has deep embedding.
Teams that want broader voice-assistant commands in addition to note drafting.
Buyers who prefer an integration-led rollout over self-serve start.
Epic ja EHR sobivus
Suki is strongest when the practice is US-based and wants a voice assistant embedded into a supported EHR workflow. Notat fits teams that want EHR flexibility: Epic can be supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records, but Notat is not dependent on Epic and is lighter than Epic-first enterprise scribes.
Keele ja vastavuse sobivus
Notat is strongest when multilingual capture, EU/GDPR posture, HIPAA with BAA, and clinician-visible facts are buying criteria. Competitor language and compliance claims should be checked against current public documentation and your data-processing requirements.
Soovitus
Choose Suki when its EHR assistant workflow matches your US practice. Choose Notat when you need facts-first note generation, visible raw context, multilingual workflows, and a self-serve path that does not depend on a specific EHR integration.
Notat
Notat is the Clinical AI Platform built on the patent-pending FactsContext™ engine: it extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter first, generates documentation from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician. Notat supports spoken capture in 90+ languages, EU-hosted GDPR workflows, HIPAA with a BAA, and EHR transfer options for independent practices and clinics.
Suki
Suki is a US-focused voice AI assistant and scribe, well funded ($70M Series D in October 2024) and known for deep EHR embedding with partners such as MEDENT.
Funktsioonide võrdlus
Konkurentide lahtrid kannavad kuupäeva, millal neid viimati avalikest allikatest kontrolliti. Kõik, mida me ei saanud kinnitada, on märgitud "Avalikult dokumenteerimata" — mitte kunagi oletatud.
AI arhitektuur ja hallutsinatsioonide kaitse
Facts-first generation (hallucination safeguard)
Notat
Jah
FactsContext™ (patent ootel): dokumentatsioon genereeritakse väljavõetud kliinilistest faktidest, mitte toortranskriptidest
Suki
Avalikult dokumenteerimata
Raw clinical facts shown to the clinician
Notat
Jah
Toored väljavõetud meditsiinilised faktid kuvatakse kliinikule ülevaatamiseks, kinnitamiseks ja taaskasutamiseks
Suki
Avalikult dokumenteerimata
Funktsioonid
Ambient visit documentation
Notat
Jah
Ambientne jäädvustamine visiidi ajal — dikteerimine pole vajalik
Suki
Jah
Voice AI assistant + ambient scribe
seisuga 2026-06-15
Medical coding suggestions
Notat
Jah
ICD-10 ja 9 muud kodeerimissüsteemi, koos toetavate tõendiväljavõtetega
Suki
Avalikult dokumenteerimata
Native iPhone, iPad & Mac apps
Notat
Jah
Loomupärased iPhone'i, iPadi ja Maci rakendused ning veeb
Suki
Avalikult dokumenteerimata
Keeled
Multilingual & cross-language documentation
Notat
Jah
Kõne jäädvustamine 99+ keeles; toode tõlgitud 15 keelde: inglise, norra, taani, rootsi, soome, eesti, hollandi, saksa, hispaania, itaalia, prantsuse, araabia, poola, portugali ja hindi
Suki
Avalikult dokumenteerimata
Vastavusnõuded ja andmetöötlus
GDPR-native / EU hosting
Notat
Jah
GDPR-põhine, majutus EL-is/Norras
Suki
Avalikult dokumenteerimata
HIPAA / BAA
Notat
Jah
HIPAA-ühilduv; BAA saadaval
Suki
Avalikult dokumenteerimata
Zero audio retention
Notat
Jah
Nulli helisalvestiste säilitamine — töödeldud ja kustutatud
Suki
Avalikult dokumenteerimata
Kasutuselevõtt
Epic / EHR support
Notat
Osaliselt
Epic on toetatud sama EHR-i integratsioonikihiga nagu teised andmed; Notat ei ole ainult Epic-põhine ega Epic-ist sõltuv
Suki
Osaliselt
US-focused, integration-dependent EHR embedding
seisuga 2026-06-15
Hinnakujundus ja alustamine
Self-serve free trial
Notat
Jah
14 päeva tasuta, krediitkaarti pole vaja, iseteenindusega alustamine
Suki
Avalikult dokumenteerimata
Kes peaks valima millise?
Valige Notat, kui…
You want facts-first documentation with visible clinical facts
You practice outside the US or need multilingual notes
You want to start without an EHR integration project
Valige Suki, kui…
Your US practice runs an EHR that Suki embeds into deeply
Voice-assistant commands (not just documentation) are a priority
Allikad
• Suki raised a $70M Series D in October 2024. (seisuga 2026-06-15) — allikas
Korduma kippuvad küsimused
How does Notat's approach to hallucinations differ from Suki?
Notat's patent-pending FactsContext™ engine extracts structured clinical facts before drafting documentation and shows those facts to the clinician for review. We do not infer Suki's architecture when it is not publicly documented; check the linked first-party sources and ask the vendor how its safeguards work.
Do clinicians still review notes in Notat?
Always. You review and sign every note. Notat lets you check the draft against the extracted clinical facts before anything is added to the record.
Is this comparison with Suki objective?
We aim to be factual and fair. Every competitor claim carries a visible "as of" date and, where available, a public source. Cells we cannot verify from public documentation are marked "Not publicly documented" rather than guessed. If something is out of date, contact us and we will correct it.
Jätkake hindamist
FactsContext™
Vaadake, miks Notat eraldab faktid esmalt, mitte ei kirjuta otse transkriptidest.
Avatud
Hindamismeetod
Vaadage läbi läbipaistev hallutsinatsioonide metoodika ja näited.
Avatud
Mitmekeelne kirjutaja
99+ räägitud keelt ja 15 tõlgitud tootekeelt.
Avatud
ICD-10 keskus
Vaadake koodisoovitusi koos tõendite ja tingimuspõhiste juhenditega.
Avatud
Vaadake fakte oma järgmise märkme taga.
Kiireim viis võrdlemiseks on proovida: salvestage konsultatsioon, vaadake, kuidas FactsContext™ eraldab kliinilised faktid, ja lugege märge, mida saate rida realt kontrollida.
Proovige Notat tasuta