Comparison · Last updated 2026-06-15

Notat vs Suki

Notat vs Suki: an honest, dated comparison of AI architecture and hallucination safeguards, languages, compliance, deployment, and pricing for clinical AI documentation.

Praktisk köpvägledning

Där Notat är starkare

FactsContext™ extracts clinical facts first, writes from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician for review.

Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages and product translation in 15 languages, with multilingual and cross-language workflows treated as core use cases.

Notat is Epic-capable without being Epic-locked, so small practices and non-Epic clinics can start without adopting an Epic-first stack.

Där Suki kan vara starkare

US practices already using an EHR where Suki has deep embedding.

Teams that want broader voice-assistant commands in addition to note drafting.

Buyers who prefer an integration-led rollout over self-serve start.

Epic- och EHR-anpassning

Suki is strongest when the practice is US-based and wants a voice assistant embedded into a supported EHR workflow. Notat fits teams that want EHR flexibility: Epic can be supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records, but Notat is not dependent on Epic and is lighter than Epic-first enterprise scribes.

Språk och regelefterlevnad

Notat is strongest when multilingual capture, EU/GDPR posture, HIPAA with BAA, zero audio retention, and clinician-visible facts are buying criteria. Competitor language and compliance claims should be checked against current public documentation and your data-processing requirements.

Rekommendation

Choose Suki when its EHR assistant workflow matches your US practice. Choose Notat when you need facts-first note generation, visible raw context, multilingual workflows, and a self-serve path that does not depend on a specific EHR integration.

Notat

Notat is the Clinical AI Platform built on the patent-pending FactsContext™ engine: it extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter first, generates documentation from those facts — never straight from a transcript — and shows the raw facts to the clinician. Multilingual by design, Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages through its AssemblyAI-powered speech layer, and the product is translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi. GDPR-native with EU hosting, HIPAA-compliant with BAA, Epic-capable through the same EHR integration layer as other records, and built for independent and allied-health practices as well as clinics.

Suki

Suki is a US-focused voice AI assistant and scribe, well funded ($70M Series D in October 2024) and known for deep EHR embedding with partners such as MEDENT.

Funktionsjämförelse

Konkurrentens celler visar datumet de senast verifierades från publika källor. Allt vi inte kunde verifiera är markerat som ”Inte offentligt dokumenterat” — aldrig gissat.

AI architecture & hallucination safeguards

Facts-first generation (hallucination safeguard)

Notat

Ja

FactsContext™ (patent pending): documentation is generated from extracted clinical facts, not raw transcripts

Suki

Inte offentligt dokumenterad

Raw clinical facts shown to the clinician

Notat

Ja

Raw extracted medical facts are shown to the clinician to inspect, verify, and reuse

Suki

Inte offentligt dokumenterad

Features

Ambient visit documentation

Notat

Ja

Ambient capture during the visit — no dictation required

Suki

Ja

Voice AI assistant + ambient scribe

per 2026-06-15

Medical coding suggestions

Notat

Ja

ICD-10 and 9 other coding systems, with supporting evidence excerpts

Suki

Inte offentligt dokumenterad

Native iPhone, iPad & Mac apps

Notat

Ja

Native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps plus web

Suki

Inte offentligt dokumenterad

Languages

Multilingual & cross-language documentation

Notat

Ja

Spoken capture in 99+ languages; product translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi

Suki

Inte offentligt dokumenterad

Compliance & data handling

GDPR-native / EU hosting

Notat

Ja

GDPR-native, EU/Norway hosting

Suki

Inte offentligt dokumenterad

HIPAA / BAA

Notat

Ja

HIPAA-compliant; BAA available

Suki

Inte offentligt dokumenterad

Zero audio retention

Notat

Ja

Zero audio retention — processed and deleted

Suki

Inte offentligt dokumenterad

Deployment

Epic / EHR support

Notat

Delvis

Epic is supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records; Notat is not Epic-only or dependent on Epic

Suki

Delvis

US-focused, integration-dependent EHR embedding

per 2026-06-15

Pricing & getting started

Self-serve free trial

Notat

Ja

14 days free, no credit card, self-serve start

Suki

Inte offentligt dokumenterad

Vem bör välja vad?

Välj Notat om…

You want facts-first documentation with visible clinical facts

You practice outside the US or need multilingual notes

You want to start without an EHR integration project

Välj Suki om…

Your US practice runs an EHR that Suki embeds into deeply

Voice-assistant commands (not just documentation) are a priority

Källor

Suki raised a $70M Series D in October 2024. (per 2026-06-15)källa

Vanliga frågor

How does Notat's approach to hallucinations differ from Suki?

Notat's patent-pending FactsContext™ engine extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter before generating any documentation, and only writes from those facts — the raw facts are shown to you so every sentence can be verified against its source. Most AI scribes generate notes directly from a transcript, which leaves more room for unsupported statements. Check Suki's public documentation for details of their safeguards.

Do clinicians still review notes in Notat?

Always. You review and sign every note — Notat makes review faster because you can check the note against the extracted clinical facts instead of re-listening to the visit.

Is this comparison with Suki objective?

We aim to be factual and fair. Every competitor claim carries a visible "as of" date and, where available, a public source. Cells we cannot verify from public documentation are marked "Not publicly documented" rather than guessed. If something is out of date, contact us and we will correct it.

Se fakta bakom din nästa anteckning.

Det snabbaste sättet att jämföra är att prova själv: spela in en konsultation, se FactsContext™ extrahera de kliniska fakta, och läs ett anteckningsdokument som du kan verifiera rad för rad.

Prova Notat gratis