Notat vs Suki
Notat vs Suki: an honest, dated comparison of AI architecture and hallucination safeguards, languages, compliance, deployment, and pricing for clinical AI documentation.
Käytännön osto-opas
Missä Notat on vahvempi
FactsContext™ extracts clinical facts first, writes from those facts, and shows the raw facts to the clinician for review.
Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages and product translation in 15 languages, with multilingual and cross-language workflows treated as core use cases.
Notat is Epic-capable without being Epic-locked, so small practices and non-Epic clinics can start without adopting an Epic-first stack.
Missä Suki saattaa olla vahvempi
US practices already using an EHR where Suki has deep embedding.
Teams that want broader voice-assistant commands in addition to note drafting.
Buyers who prefer an integration-led rollout over self-serve start.
Epic- ja EHR-yhteensopivuus
Suki is strongest when the practice is US-based and wants a voice assistant embedded into a supported EHR workflow. Notat fits teams that want EHR flexibility: Epic can be supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records, but Notat is not dependent on Epic and is lighter than Epic-first enterprise scribes.
Kieli ja vaatimustenmukaisuus
Notat is strongest when multilingual capture, EU/GDPR posture, HIPAA with BAA, zero audio retention, and clinician-visible facts are buying criteria. Competitor language and compliance claims should be checked against current public documentation and your data-processing requirements.
Suositus
Choose Suki when its EHR assistant workflow matches your US practice. Choose Notat when you need facts-first note generation, visible raw context, multilingual workflows, and a self-serve path that does not depend on a specific EHR integration.
Notat
Notat is the Clinical AI Platform built on the patent-pending FactsContext™ engine: it extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter first, generates documentation from those facts — never straight from a transcript — and shows the raw facts to the clinician. Multilingual by design, Notat supports spoken capture in 99+ languages through its AssemblyAI-powered speech layer, and the product is translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi. GDPR-native with EU hosting, HIPAA-compliant with BAA, Epic-capable through the same EHR integration layer as other records, and built for independent and allied-health practices as well as clinics.
Suki
Suki is a US-focused voice AI assistant and scribe, well funded ($70M Series D in October 2024) and known for deep EHR embedding with partners such as MEDENT.
Ominaisuuksien vertailu
Kilpailijan solut sisältävät päivämäärän, jolloin tiedot on viimeksi varmistettu julkisista lähteistä. Kaikki, mitä emme voineet varmistaa, on merkitty tekstillä ”Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu” — emme koskaan arvaa.
AI architecture & hallucination safeguards
Facts-first generation (hallucination safeguard)
Notat
Kyllä
FactsContext™ (patent pending): documentation is generated from extracted clinical facts, not raw transcripts
Suki
Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu
Raw clinical facts shown to the clinician
Notat
Kyllä
Raw extracted medical facts are shown to the clinician to inspect, verify, and reuse
Suki
Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu
Features
Ambient visit documentation
Notat
Kyllä
Ambient capture during the visit — no dictation required
Suki
Kyllä
Voice AI assistant + ambient scribe
tilanne: 2026-06-15
Medical coding suggestions
Notat
Kyllä
ICD-10 and 9 other coding systems, with supporting evidence excerpts
Suki
Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu
Native iPhone, iPad & Mac apps
Notat
Kyllä
Native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps plus web
Suki
Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu
Languages
Multilingual & cross-language documentation
Notat
Kyllä
Spoken capture in 99+ languages; product translated in 15 languages: English, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Finnish, Estonian, Dutch, German, Spanish, Italian, French, Arabic, Polish, Portuguese, and Hindi
Suki
Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu
Compliance & data handling
GDPR-native / EU hosting
Notat
Kyllä
GDPR-native, EU/Norway hosting
Suki
Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu
HIPAA / BAA
Notat
Kyllä
HIPAA-compliant; BAA available
Suki
Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu
Zero audio retention
Notat
Kyllä
Zero audio retention — processed and deleted
Suki
Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu
Deployment
Epic / EHR support
Notat
Osittainen
Epic is supported through the same EHR integration layer as other records; Notat is not Epic-only or dependent on Epic
Suki
Osittainen
US-focused, integration-dependent EHR embedding
tilanne: 2026-06-15
Pricing & getting started
Self-serve free trial
Notat
Kyllä
14 days free, no credit card, self-serve start
Suki
Ei julkisesti dokumentoitu
Kuka valitsee kumman?
Valitse Notat, jos…
You want facts-first documentation with visible clinical facts
You practice outside the US or need multilingual notes
You want to start without an EHR integration project
Valitse Suki, jos…
Your US practice runs an EHR that Suki embeds into deeply
Voice-assistant commands (not just documentation) are a priority
Lähteet
• Suki raised a $70M Series D in October 2024. (tilanne: 2026-06-15) — lähde
Usein kysytyt kysymykset
How does Notat's approach to hallucinations differ from Suki?
Notat's patent-pending FactsContext™ engine extracts structured clinical facts from the encounter before generating any documentation, and only writes from those facts — the raw facts are shown to you so every sentence can be verified against its source. Most AI scribes generate notes directly from a transcript, which leaves more room for unsupported statements. Check Suki's public documentation for details of their safeguards.
Do clinicians still review notes in Notat?
Always. You review and sign every note — Notat makes review faster because you can check the note against the extracted clinical facts instead of re-listening to the visit.
Is this comparison with Suki objective?
We aim to be factual and fair. Every competitor claim carries a visible "as of" date and, where available, a public source. Cells we cannot verify from public documentation are marked "Not publicly documented" rather than guessed. If something is out of date, contact us and we will correct it.
Jatka arviointia
FactsContext™
Katso, miksi Notat poimii ensin faktat kirjoittamatta suoraan transkriptioista.
Avoimuus
Arviointimenetelmä
Tarkista läpinäkyvä hallusinaatiometodologia ja esimerkit.
Avoimuus
Monikielinen diktaattori
99+ puhetta ja 15 käännettyä tuotekieltä.
Avoimuus
ICD-10-keskus
Katso koodiehdotukset todisteiden ja sairauskuntakohtaisten oppaiden avulla.
Avoimuus
Näe faktat seuraavan muistiosi takana.
Nopein tapa vertailla on kokeilla: tallenna konsultointi, katso kuinka FactsContext™ poimii kliiniset faktat ja lue muistio, jonka voit todentaa rivi riviltä.
Kokeile Notat ilmaiseksi